Just see this picture, i'm still confused about this picture.

image:

Of course photoshop

I won't be surprised if its a panoramic view as well of the bridge using a tripod.

It's hard to think how you could take a picture like this.

All of this is opinion .. but my method is I cut the picture in half and examine them as two separate parts of the same whole. First the resolution is strikingly different. One half is sharp and crisp while the other looks zoomed in and blurrier. In addition the light source (represented in the sky) is different as if the sun is higher in the sky in one half than the other.

The greenery in the background looks different (one half the greenery looks wet and has blooming trees and the other half looks like dry the shrubbery look dead). One half shows the bridge itself in an unnatural slant that wouldn't agree with the other straight half. Lastly there is a part in the bridge that looks sutchered to me.

Compare with examples in doc file:
http://www.fileflyer.com/view/ApqeYAj

yeah, I just realized that the top of the tree, the trees look wet. if maybe it's true, I just realized that a tripod can capture images 360 degrees.

But I see the middle of the bridge there seems to be a line that cut timber in the middle, it looks odd.

But this time I prefer to believe that it is edited photo.

there may be others who want to express their opinions?

I think he cut the image in half, The repasted it on the bottom, Thus 180* 180*

I Found it ! its real Photoshop !

The Technique is > File > automate > and photomerge