WebArtz - The Web Design Forum
Welcome to WebArtz, Guest!

WebArtz is a nice place for discussions related to web designing and coding. We help our members to code their own website templates with HTML and CSS. We give them advice on various issues.

To know more about WebArtz Forum, visit the About Us page.

At the moment, you are viewing the forum as a guest. As a guest you can't make post and participate in discussions. You need to register and become a member of the forum. Click the register link below and become a part of this forum.

Thank You

WebArtz - The Web Design Forum
Welcome to WebArtz, Guest!

WebArtz is a nice place for discussions related to web designing and coding. We help our members to code their own website templates with HTML and CSS. We give them advice on various issues.

To know more about WebArtz Forum, visit the About Us page.

At the moment, you are viewing the forum as a guest. As a guest you can't make post and participate in discussions. You need to register and become a member of the forum. Click the register link below and become a part of this forum.

Thank You


You are not connected. Please login or register

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1Consumers 'confused by copyright' Empty Consumers 'confused by copyright' Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:37 am

Sanket

Sanket
Administrator
Administrator
Consumers are confused by copyright laws that mean it is still illegal to copy a CD onto their computer, a watchdog says.

Consumer Focus said that copyright law was outdated and millions of people were unaware they were breaking laws.

But a legal expert has said that there was no danger of individual consumers being prosecuted for copying music and films for their own use.

Instead commercial operations are the focus of law enforcement.

Rules


The current state of the law means that it is illegal for somebody to copy a CD or DVD onto a computer or an Ipod for their own use. This copying to a different device is known as format shifting.

In a poll of 2,026 people, some 73% said that they did not know what they could copy or record.

Jill Johnstone, of Consumer Focus, called for the law to be updated to take the advance of technology into account.

"The world has moved on and reform of copyright law is inevitable, but it is not going to update itself," she said.

However, IT lawyer Nick Lockett, of DL Legal, said that nobody was being prosecuted for the technical breach in the law. Those who set up commercial operations were more at risk of prosecution, he added.

He said a similar issue arose when video recorders allowed people to record a television show and watch it later in the day - which at the time was illegal.

An amendment to copyright laws only came after video recorders had been on the market for some time.

One argument against allowing people to shift their music or films onto a different format was that the artists could claim that these works only had a limited lifespan and so people should pay them again for having the work on a different format.

Separate proposals to disconnect so-called peer to peer file-sharers has caused concern among internet campaigners.

This is when people share music or films even though only one of them has bought the original.

http://www.webartzforum.com

View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum